![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:42 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
At least it takes away from the ridiculous gap between the roofline and the wheels.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:47 |
|
Yikes.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:49 |
|
This is a non-GM modification?
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:50 |
|
I wonder how chassis rigidity is.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:50 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:54 |
|
Yep.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:54 |
|
Noodly
![]() 02/18/2018 at 20:57 |
|
Why was this the first thing that entered my mind when I read the headline?
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:00 |
|
Because cigs ruin cars too.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:02 |
|
I...
I don’t hate it.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:05 |
|
I mean it looks better than the coupe, which isn’t saying much. But dat chassis rigidity.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:11 |
|
Yeah I’m ok with this. At least they didn’t use one of those bitch basket bars
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:11 |
|
True, it’s probably horrible to drive.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:13 |
|
Wasn’t an ATS convertible actually planned? I remember reading something about a full 3-series-esque lineup before the car was unveiled.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:20 |
|
Wrong. Those actually help regain structural rigidity.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:20 |
|
IDK, but this isn’t factory.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:26 |
|
There is an impressively large market for making new cars significantly worse.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:27 |
|
There’s something irronic about a Chevy Caprise with “crush proof box” written on it.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:28 |
|
No kidding. My boss was a pack a day smoker. Now that he quit he HATES getting into his own car because of the smell.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:29 |
|
If this wasn’t a V I’d be in full support
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:40 |
|
I don’t see a problem, except that it was pointless to use a V car to make a convertible. Kind of a waste there.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:45 |
|
I love how they avoided taking pics with the top up. But jeez, that price tag.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:45 |
|
But they always look bad. Always.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:48 |
|
Wrong
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:54 |
|
Yeah I would rather pay more money for an aftermarket ATSV convertible than an actual factory M4 convertible.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:56 |
|
I would just buy a Boxter if I wanted a droptop in that price range. But I wouldn’t because I hate droptops.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:56 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 21:57 |
|
Nah you just proved my point
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:00 |
|
The M4 is more of a direct comparison here though.
I love convertibles but wouldn’t touch this with a ten foot pole
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:03 |
|
Fairly similar price point though.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:04 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:04 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:05 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:11 |
|
New M4 convertible runs 85-95k it seems. You’d have to check a lot of boxes to get to 102k
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:16 |
|
Boxter S starts at $70k.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:17 |
|
Yes it was, a wagon too.
![]() 02/18/2018 at 22:23 |
|
Boxster and M4 are both better than spending 102k on a Caddy that’s been modified with a Sawzall
![]() 02/18/2018 at 23:06 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 23:07 |
|
![]() 02/18/2018 at 23:08 |
|
![]() 02/19/2018 at 01:14 |
|
How about a C63 convertible?
![]() 02/19/2018 at 03:58 |
|
Ooh yeah that would be sweet- would rather have that too then this hack job